Original text in Black. My response in Red. Their response in Blue. My clarification in Gold.

Hi Russ,
Weekly classes — Wunderbar!

Stuff:
Seem to realize what it means to “drink from an empty cup”. Started the motorcycle [Refers to a perpetual state of self-remembering]. OMG. Whatsa that noise?

Starting the motorcycle alters how I see exercises. Up until now I use exercises to “start” and observe the machine. Now it seems I just ride it and have a vehicle for exploring both inner and outer worlds; i.e., practicing hitting and fielding are different than playing the game of baseball. Time to “Play Ball!” Yes? Hints? Comments?

Initially, people spend all their efforts trying to experience a higher state.  Now, you get to learn how to maneuver with one in place. Ride on.
Remember the scenery… for you will be called upon to explain it to others "as" or "before" they encounter it.

You are referring to the scenery in recent emails: “Glorious Day”, “What was; What is; and What will be” and this one. Yes? 

Yes, and all that you will see from this point forward.  Everyone makes the same journey and passes the same scenery as they make that journey.  Remember what you see and pass through, as you now make the journey, so that you will know, both, what they will go through, as well as, where they are when they explain their experiences to you… and, therefore, you are better able to explain the journey to them before/after/or as they make it.

Once I explained man’s choices as being similar to this idea but that they were dependent on his level of being.  His possible choices are liken to a triangle.  At a low level of being he has many choices (represented by a line drawn across the triangle – near the bottom).  As his level of being raises, he has less choices (represented by a line drawn across the triangle – higher up).  Higher still, shorter line… less choices. All men who reach the top, see the world the same and have only one choice.
    
Thus, as we ascend, and as the choices get fewer and fewer the scenery becomes more and more the same.
      
Seems I “Play Ball” today, particularly in relationship to other people. Amazing, spooky and seemingly effective. My manifestations are similar to when “I am full of myself” except that now “I am nothing”; there is no sense of “I” and the outcomes seem remarkable. I imagine I will begin to see where I need to become more skillful as I monitor outcomes. Comments?

The "full of yourself" feeling is most likely because you are now beginning to have your center of gravity inside yourself and not outside, i.e., "I am going to the park" or, "I am at the store"… instead of "I am going to the park" or I am at the store", thus maneuvering through life is almost effortless as the inside center of gravity "man" stays constant, i.e., "I"; whereas the outside center of gravity of "man" keeps changing, i.e., "park" – "store", etc.

I guess I do feel full of myself but not how I felt in the past when I am full of myself. The manifestations are similar but there is no sense of “I”; there is no attachment; in fact there is wonder at what is occurring. I notice this similarity and the question arises, “Is there a difference and if so what is it?” It appears that a distinction can be made between “spontaneous” and “reactionary”. “Reactionary manifestations” always carry a strong sense of “I”, e.g., “I am pissed”; and there is an automatic logic to support the pissyness, e.g., “I am pissed because…”. “Spontaneous manifestations” do not have this sense of “I”. When asked, logical reasons can be given for the manifestation but these reasons are not the cause. For instance, when I do landscape construction, my favorite part of the job is spotting plants. I spot the plants; look at them from the living room window, from the front door, from the front gate, from the corners of the yard. When they are spotted I rotate the plants to their best side. I spot without thinking just looking. When the owner asks why the plant is here and not somewhere else, a dozen reasons arise. The owner says, “Wow” and so do I.

What you say about a shift from object to subject makes sense, but I am puzzled due to the absence of a “sense of I” since “I am Nothing”.  In the last few hours, I play with “I AM” where I = NOTHING and AM = 3 TOTALTIES. Sounds similar to: Praise God, from whom all blessings flow;  Praise him, all creatures here below; Praise him above, ye heav’nly host; Praise Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.  God in three persons. Oh well, I hope the Evangelical inquisitors are not monitoring your emails.

Today I am just a “dirt bag” riding his Hog. The sense of freedom is intoxicating. Wunderbar.

The sense of I is usually attached to an object, i.e., I am pissed. I took your comment, “I am full of myself”, to suggest that you were being present in the moment – all there. Hard to explain what the focus is when YOU are present in the moment, instead of THE MOMENT being present in you. But, I’ll try :-).

YOU being present in the moment, focuses on the moment… not on you (because you are full).

THE MOMENT being present in you, focuses on you as being a reflection of the moment.

When I am present in the moment, I see the moment, i.e., the plants telling me where they should be.

When the moment is present in me, I see me dictating where I want to place them.

Perhaps I can explain it better when we next speak… that is, if I am present in the moment. 😆

Fusion can be described as the annihilation of hydrogen in the creation of helium. Yes? It can also be described as the doubling of hydrogen in the creation of helium. Yes? It can also be described as the marriage of two hydrogen atoms in the creation of helium. Yes? It can also be described as holding both hydrogens simultaneously in the creation of helium. Yes?

Interesting idea.  Hmm.  One proton in the nucleus is hydrogen,  Two protons, bound by two neutrons, in the nucleus is not just heavier hydrogen but something with entirely new properties – Helium.
 
The rub lies in the idea that 1 helium nuclei (trapped in a jar), i.e., two protons and two neutrons., weighs a tiny bit less than two hydrogen nuclei and two neutrons (trapped in a jar) , which is still two protons and two neutrons.

Both jars have the same number of protons and neutrons in them but the jar with those particles configured as helium weighs less, i.e., has less mass.

That tiny loss of mass is converted into energy (E=MC2) when it became helium.  So, since hydrogen is losing some mass to become helium, I am not sure which one of your models fits best.  BANG!

A couple of observations:

Today’s impartiality is tomorrow’s bias.

Correct in the sense that if I apply today’s impartiality to tomorrows actions, I have biased tomorrow.   However, when tomorrow becomes today, then today’s impartiality is still today’s impartiality… not yesterdays.

It is necessary to realize, “Annihilation…is a whole stick”.

I like it… or, perhaps, better yet, "Annihilation is no stick".

Read “Idiots in Paris”. Corroborates many of your statements on Pseudo-Schools email. ///BowWow!!!

One of the things I observe is that G.’s students depend on G. to create doubling situations for them. I see why this makes the “tenor” of the Sanger School so different, and frankly,“Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious”.  ///BowWow!!!